Group Admins

  • Profile picture of GarethinFrance

viewing in digital media

Public Group active 2 months, 1 week ago

We all like film – but the modern world dictates we stand most chance of promoting our work via the web. This group is about how best we can utilise modern tecnnolgy to faithfully reproduce our work

Where do you get your scans done? (21 posts)

Topic tags: 35mm, negatives, noob, scanning
  • Profile picture of Jay Harrison Jay Harrison said 2 years, 4 months ago:

    Hi,

    I’ve recently started shooting 35mm film, and I’m finding the scans that high street developers are happy to charge for are universally terrible; nothing like the quality I was expecting from viewing jpegs film users have put online. It seems like a popular choice is to invest in a good home scanner, but that’s probably not something I could afford for the foreseeable, so really I was wondering if any of you can recommend somewhere (preferably UK based) I can send my negatives to for scanning?

    Cheers,
    Jay

  • Profile picture of Chris Moret Chris Moret said 2 years, 4 months ago:

    The Canoscan 9000F doesn’t have to cost an arm and leg. And it does the job for publishing on the web. I use it myself for 35mm and 6×7.

    Gr. Chris

  • Profile picture of Fotohuis Fotohuis said 2 years, 4 months ago:

    V500 Epson (35mm, roll film) and if you scan a lot and also L.F. V700 Epson.
    For internet more then enough resolution and prints till A4 are OK too. In M.F. 6×7 cm A3 without any problems.

    Regards,

    Robert

  • Profile picture of Jay Harrison Jay Harrison said 2 years, 4 months ago:

    Thanks, looks like I should give home scanning some more thought…

  • Profile picture of jeremy jeremy said 2 years, 3 months ago:

    I use an Epson v750 which will scan anything.

  • Profile picture of Ronald Thain Ronald Thain said 2 years, 3 months ago:

    I’ve just tried out a company calling themselves Fuji Digital Imaging in Burnley, Lancashire. Folow them on Twitter @FujiDigital. Their processing prices are good and their free scans are far better than any other lab I’ve used. http://www.photofilmprocessing.co.uk/PhotoCDdetails.html

  • Profile picture of Manuel Gonçalves Manuel Gonçalves said 2 years, 3 months ago:

    I have sent a film to Ilford Lab and asked for a scan. Their prints have a very good quality. I hope it is the same with the scan. When I get it back from them I will post what I think about it.

  • Profile picture of ragnar ragnar said 2 years, 3 months ago:

    are the Canoscan 9000f or the epson v500 and v700 any good for scanning slides as its not economical to get them done commercially.
    thanks
    ragnar

  • Profile picture of Darren M Gomes Darren M Gomes said 2 years, 2 months ago:

    Most high street ‘labs’ scan film at 72dpi for CD, which is only good enough for websites. The Fuji Frontier and Noritsu film printers can scan at much higher resolutions, but they won’t get set higher as it takes much, much longer for a film to go through and be scanned. I only get my films scanned that way when I need to e-mail photo samples quickly, when I need high res scans, I use my Nikon Coolscan IV. Sometimes, if I can afford it, I’ll get my films processed and scanned at a pro lab, usually Genie in Wandsworth, where they’re scanned at 300dpi, which is high enough for large format printing. I recently got myself a Canon Canoscan 9000f for my medium format films and 35mm IR, so far, I’ve only tried a few test scans, of 120 format, it’s been OK, but does tend to scan a bit soft. It did get slightly higher reviews than it’s Epson equivalent.

  • Profile picture of Tristan Tristan said 2 years, 1 month ago:

    Most labs that process film will be able to offer a higher resolution scan then the standard setting, which is generally of quite a low quality. The higher resolution settings on Noritsu & Fuji printers are excellent, and can give fantastic results, so it is worth asking at local labs what they are able to offer above their standard service, maybe having the whole film scanned at the basic resolution, then selecting a few frames to be scanned at a larger size.
    A good relationship with a local lab can be very useful!

  • Profile picture of Ron Craig Ron Craig said 2 years ago:

    I’d echo the recommendation to pick up your own scanner. With a factory refurbished Epson flatbed scanner I can easily print 16×20 and larger from medium format. I would also recommend getting a film holder if you pick up a flatbed scanner – keeping the film flat during scanning will have a big impact on the sharpness of the scan.

    Cheers,

    Ron.
    ronaldcraig.com

  • Profile picture of jdjacob jdjacob said 1 year, 5 months ago:

    What about getting a good scan of a print? I put a lot of dedication into my printing process, and rather show a product through burning/dodging than scanning a negative and using photoshop. I would like to get some of my prints on this site, just need to find a way to scan large prints

  • Profile picture of elinamanda elinamanda said 1 year, 5 months ago:

    I’m sorted for the scanning for the web bit, but what about scanning for exhibiton prints (A2 and bigger)?

  • Profile picture of FM3AandFM2 FM3AandFM2 said 1 year, 5 months ago:

    [IMG]http://i677.photobucket.com/albums/vv137/NikonFM3/Alumb3.jpg[/IMG
    (Scanned Real print above.) Home scanning is the way to go – I have scanned Reala prints using an Epson 4490 and can get better quality prints out of it with my home printer than the original prints supplied by the D&P lab as sometimes their prints have colour casts and various printing faults. The Epson 4490 is great for slides but not so good for negatives however and the ICE technology does not seem to work very well in my experience – much better to keep the original slide clean before you scan.

  • Profile picture of FM3AandFM2 FM3AandFM2 said 1 year, 5 months ago:

    Ah, I see the link to a print does not work – sorry – see under recent images if you want to see the scanned Real print – Robin